Hereâs a page I ran across in a post on LinkedIn by design educator Ryan Rumsey: itâs a collection of articles, posts, and essaysâdating from 2005 to last weekâdeclaring, in various ways, that (for various definitions) the practice of design is dead.
I havenât read all of the pieces collected here, and I donât necessarily recommend trying. What I find interesting here is the sheer number of pieces collected so far, and what it might mean about the discourse of design as a job in general.
The internetâs a big place. Statistically, a lot of people are probably going to be saying something like âdesign is deadâ at any given time. But these posts demonstrate a few qualities that I think illustrate something about how we feel about our jobs:
- They often rely on a specific name for a specific type of design, whichâat the time of writingâappears to be on shaky ground, outmoded, or otherwise endangered.
- Many involve questions or uncertainty around how changing technological landscapes will impact the kind of work we, as âdesignersâ of any type, can/will/should/should not do.
- Often, the death of design is invoked as a precursor to a perspective on the practice that isnât actually suggestive of its deathâit may just be adding nuance, systemic understanding, or broader views on the practice of intentional making.
- Design is experiencing a crisis of meaning! All the previous factors and more are continually coming to bear on our industry and, absent a wider perspective, weâre really unsure what to do. In this frame, the concept of âUXâ is itself highly questionable.
Similar to the piece I recently shared about âFictional Computers and Their Themes,â I think this assemblage offersâbeyond the face value of the posts withinâsome clarifying news that, no matter whatâs happening, the design community cyclically experiences its own emotional, intellectual, or technological âdeath,â only to continue on in our pursuit of making things well for other people.
Check out the Notion collection.